Archives

Browse by Month

• March 2011
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009

Browse by Year

• 2011
• 2010
• 2009

Browse Last 50 Posts

• Discovery of Anonymous Online Speakers(0)
• The Commercial Speech Exemption to the anti-SLAPP Statute.(0)
• Return of Limited Power of Attorney Documents by Retired UAL Pilots(0)
• (Re)introduction to UAL Retired Pilots(0)
• When is a Trademark Abandoned?(0)
• A Lawyers Guide to Branding(6)
• “WOULD YOU RATHER…?” Is this Trademark Distinctive?(2)
• Lanham Act Claims Extend to False Statements by Implication and Innuendo w/ Comments re: SCO v. IBM Case(41)
• Business Method & Software Patents Survive Biliski v. Kappos(0)
• Complex Litigation—a Game of Chess, not Checkers(15)
• No Duty of Care to Prevent Violence from a Third Party(0)
• Copyright Registration is “Precondition” to Filing a Claim—But is NOT “Jurisdictional”(0)
• “Obviousness” v. “Anticipation”—Similar but Different Patent Law Defenses(0)
• Malicious Prosecution–Against Opposing Counsel–in California(1)
• US Supreme Court Decides “Principal Place of Business” Test for Corporate Diversity Jurisdiction(0)
• SCO v. Novell: Trial Court Denies Novell’s Motion in Limine, Preserving SCO’s Slander of Title Claims for the Jury(0)
• CGL Policy Does Not Cover “Fax Blasts” in California(0)
• “Intent” to Induce Patent Infringement, Revisited(0)
• Twitter and Fair Use(0)
• Rolling Stone Article~Camel Cigarette Ad: Protected Speech(1)
• Direct Shareholder Claims Allowed in Apple Stock Backdating Scheme–but No Remedy(0)
• Trial Judge Removes Final Obstacles to Trial in SCO v. Novell Slander of Copyright Title Case(1)
• Mashups and Fair Use(0)
• US Supreme Court Requires “Direct Causal Relationship” in Proving RICO Damages(0)
• California Court of Appeals Finds Statutory Notification Duty Under Void Commercial Insurance Policy(0)
• Pre-Internet Patent Specification Fails to Anticipate Internet-Based Embodiments(0)
• No Duty to Defend False Advertising Claim(1)
• New Patent Damages Handbook for use by Federal District Court Judges(0)
• Southern Cal Beats South Carolina in Trademark Case(4)
• The Basics of Patent Claim Construction(0)
• Attorneys Fees Claim in Shareholder Derivative Case Disallowed Where Lawyers Failed to Attempt Settlement Discussions before Filing Lawsuit(0)
• No Duty for Senior Lienholder to Search for Junior Lienholders after Real Estate Foreclosure(0)
• $20 Million Damages Award to Mark Geragos Reduced in “Michael Jackson Video” Case(1)
• A Client’s Guide to Electronic Discovery Planning(0)
• The “Hardship” Defense in Unlawful Detainer Proceedings under Commercial Leases(0)
• The End of Bright-Line Tests in Patent Litigation(0)
• Narrow Interpretation of Sexual Harassment Claims(0)
• Punitive Damages and Agency Limitations(0)
• Qualcomm v. Broadcom: Counsel Sanctioned for Discovery Abuse(0)
• Production of Internet Server Log Files(0)
• Duty of Document Preservation and “Litigation Hold”(0)